News Ticker

Cases in Texas Reveal Constitutional Problems for Judges – They Can’t Proceed … ?

Sister Federal Tax Case: Judge and DOJ Attorneys Abandon Case Midstream, Decline to Participate any Further

Posted October 28, 2015

On September 14, 2015, Petitioner filed in United States District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division Case No. 9:14-CV-138, Defendant’s Objection to Denial of Due Process of Law and Demand for Disclosure of the Constitutional Authority that Gives the Court the Capacity to Take Jurisdiction and Enter Judgments, Orders, and Decrees in Favor of the United States Arising from a Civil or Criminal Proceeding Regarding a Debt, in Tyler County, Texas (the “Objection and Demand”).

Plaintiff United States had 14 days to respond, but went silent (first and only time of which Petitioner is aware, that the government failed to respond to a challenge of jurisdiction).

As of September 29, 2015, it was incumbent on the Court to dismiss the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) or (h)(3) or 41(b).

The Court, however, stood mute.

Thereafter, Petitioner filed on September 30, 2015, Petitioner’s Demand for Dismissal, with Prejudice, of this Alleged Case for Lack of Constitutional Authority that Gives the Court the Capacity to Take Jurisdiction and Enter Judgments, Orders, and Decrees in Favor of the United States Arising from a Civil or Criminal Proceeding Regarding a Debt, in Tyler County, Texas (the “Demand for Dismissal”).

Plaintiff had until October 14, 2015, to produce the constitutional authority that gives the Court the capacity to take jurisdiction in Tyler County, Texas.

As of this post (October 28, 2015), 44 days have passed since the filing of the Objection and Demand and 28 since the Demand for Dismissal and neither the judge nor either of the Department of Justice attorneys has responded in any way following Petitioner’s demands.

The reason neither the judge nor DOJ attorneys will respond or confirm or deny Petitioner’s filings, is that anything that any of them may say in writing—whether for or against Petitioner—will evince treason to the Constitution, not only on their part, but on the part of every other Federal judge and DOJ attorney doing business anywhere in the Union.

Notwithstanding that the penalty for treason to the Constitution is death, the Federal judge and DOJ attorneys in this case have a more pressing situation on their hands:

The entire fraudulent Federal judicial apparatus is at stake because no contemporary Federal court has the capacity to take jurisdiction and enter judgments, orders, or decrees in favor of the United States arising from a civil or criminal proceeding regarding a debt, in any county, parish, or borough in America—and there is no reason why the above filings from this case will not produce the same results in any other Federal case, civil or criminal, anywhere in the Union.

If the Department of Justice cannot win a case anywhere in America, the days of the hoax of Federal jurisdiction over the American People are numbered.

The sister Federal tax case in the Lufkin Division was an attempt to foreclose on Federal tax liens filed against Petitioner’s ranch. Judge and plaintiff having departed the field of battle, said case is over in substance—Petitioner prevailing.

Regarding the original Federal tax case, United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division Civil No. 4:14-cv-0027 (which the Supreme Court declined to review): There are other remedies available to Petitioner and Petitioner is pursuing them. Developments will be posted on this website as they occur.

 

AIS Note:  We have requested any and all documents in this and related cases from the source and will post them when received.

8 Comments on Cases in Texas Reveal Constitutional Problems for Judges – They Can’t Proceed … ?

  1. You all are doing excellent work. A applaud your energy and diligence. Thank you

  2. If we don’t stop this crap the elite are doing our progeny will suffer much greater fate than we. It would be nice to build on this information with a succinct list of what we have the right to demand of all the necessary licensing, insurance, oath etc. that every judge must, by law, make available to every plaintiff and defendant on demand in a court situation. I would like to ask a judge if he is paid a base salary and commission to see if he or she would lie about it.

    • Yes, we totally agree, Keith! The more we expose the system for what it is, the better chance we have to help change it. In one county in the state where I live, the people can’t even bring cellphones into the courthouse building. They are terrified that we will record their criminal acts! In my foreclosure case, I asked them to identify themselves and the response was the fast-track to foreclosure. I’m still waiting for them to produce the evidence they are who they say they are.

  3. With the leins on the a.b.a. i.b.a.and DOJ, God is incontrol- justice is coming and the texas courts too gene

  4. interested in outcome

  5. i’ts hapening in Hawaii also?

  6. WOW is right!

    Thanks, Sue!

    Peace Love Joy & Harmony,
    genevieve

  7. Wow, this is a surprise and good news! I hope this ends all corruption and put the tile of nobility and honor back in our constitution! Gene

Leave a Reply to eugene lacross Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.


*